Triple

T13857415
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Microsoft Corp. v. United States E333100 entity
Predicate lowerCourtDecision P2931 FINISHED
Object Second Circuit ruled in favor of Microsoft E333100 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Second Circuit ruled in favor of Microsoft | Statement: [Microsoft Corp. v. United States, lowerCourtDecision, Second Circuit ruled in favor of Microsoft]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Second Circuit ruled in favor of Microsoft
Context triple: [Microsoft Corp. v. United States, lowerCourtDecision, Second Circuit ruled in favor of Microsoft]
  • A. United States v. Microsoft Corp.
    United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
  • B. Microsoft Corp. v. United States chosen
    Microsoft Corp. v. United States is a landmark legal case in which the U.S. government’s authority to compel a technology company to produce customer data stored on foreign servers under U.S. law was contested.
  • C. Apple Corps v. Apple Computer
    Apple Corps v. Apple Computer was a series of high-profile trademark lawsuits between the Beatles’ record company and the technology firm over the use of the “Apple” name and logo in music-related products and services.
  • D. United States v. Bernard J. Ebbers
    United States v. Bernard J. Ebbers was the federal criminal case in which former WorldCom CEO Bernard Ebbers was prosecuted and convicted for orchestrating one of the largest accounting frauds in U.S. history.
  • E. MCI v. AT&T
    MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5ba13c8190839315f54768acfd completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de02dc9f488190b7181dcb7e304632 completed April 14, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f7c0fb7c3c819081fc6f89aa17d6af completed May 3, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:14 p.m.