Triple
T13857385
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Microsoft Corp. v. United States |
E333100
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | data privacy case |
C1254
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: data privacy case Context triple: [Microsoft Corp. v. United States, instanceOf, data privacy case]
-
A.
privacy law
chosen
Privacy law is the body of legal rules and principles that governs the collection, use, storage, and disclosure of personal information to protect individuals’ privacy rights.
-
B.
data protection solution
A data protection solution is a system or set of tools and practices designed to safeguard data from loss, corruption, unauthorized access, and misuse throughout its lifecycle.
-
C.
case review
A case review is a structured evaluation of a specific incident, project, or situation to analyze facts, assess decisions and outcomes, and identify lessons or improvements.
-
D.
Miranda doctrine case
A Miranda doctrine case is a legal case that addresses the application, scope, or interpretation of the constitutional requirement that law enforcement advise individuals of their rights (such as the right to remain silent and to an attorney) before custodial interrogation.
-
E.
data quality law
Data quality law is a conceptual class encompassing the legal principles, regulations, and standards that govern the accuracy, completeness, reliability, and appropriate use of data throughout its lifecycle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5ba13c8190839315f54768acfd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:14 p.m.