Triple

T13857339
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Warshak E333099 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object United States of America v. Steven Warshak E333099 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States of America v. Steven Warshak | Statement: [United States v. Warshak, fullName, United States of America v. Steven Warshak]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States of America v. Steven Warshak
Context triple: [United States v. Warshak, fullName, United States of America v. Steven Warshak]
  • A. United States v. Warshak chosen
    United States v. Warshak is a landmark Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that the government generally must obtain a warrant to access the contents of emails stored by a service provider, significantly shaping Fourth Amendment protections for electronic communications.
  • B. United States v. Eichman
    United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
  • C. United States v. Bajakajian
    United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
  • D. United States v. Henry
    United States v. Henry is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by limiting the government’s use of jailhouse informants to deliberately elicit incriminating statements from indicted defendants.
  • E. United States v. Dennett
    United States v. Dennett was a landmark 1930 U.S. obscenity case in which birth control advocate Mary Ware Dennett successfully challenged federal censorship of her sex education pamphlet, helping to expand protections for educational and reformist materials.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5ba13c8190839315f54768acfd completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de02dc9f488190b7181dcb7e304632 completed April 14, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f7c0fb7c3c819081fc6f89aa17d6af completed May 3, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:14 p.m.