Triple

T13846646
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Piasts of Bytom E332823 entity
Predicate hasTitle P38 FINISHED
Object Duke of Bytom E1032337 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Duke of Bytom | Statement: [Piasts of Bytom, hasTitle, Duke of Bytom]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Duke of Bytom
Context triple: [Piasts of Bytom, hasTitle, Duke of Bytom]
  • A. Duke of Bytom chosen
    The Duke of Bytom was a medieval Silesian noble title held by members of the Piast dynasty who ruled the Bytom region.
  • B. Duke of Ścinawa
    The Duke of Ścinawa was a medieval Silesian Piast ruler who governed the duchy centered on the town of Ścinawa in what is now southwestern Poland.
  • C. Duke of Sieradz
    The Duke of Sieradz was a medieval Polish noble title associated with the Piast dynasty and the rule over the Sieradz region in central Poland.
  • D. Duke of Brzeg
    The Duke of Brzeg was a hereditary noble title held by a Silesian branch of the Piast dynasty that ruled the Brzeg region in present-day Poland during the Middle Ages and early modern period.
  • E. Duke of Cieszyn
    The Duke of Cieszyn was the hereditary ruler of the Silesian duchy of Cieszyn, held by a branch of the Piast dynasty in medieval and early modern Poland.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5ba13c8190839315f54768acfd completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de02b1a25c8190a9f85ba43c421188 completed April 14, 2026, 9:02 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fe0cce10c88190bf25404fc4c75bbf completed May 8, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:13 p.m.