Triple
T13840003
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maysville Road veto |
E332631
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalArgument |
P12338
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal government should not fund purely intrastate projects |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal government should not fund purely intrastate projects | Statement: [Maysville Road veto, constitutionalArgument, federal government should not fund purely intrastate projects]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalArgument Context triple: [Maysville Road veto, constitutionalArgument, federal government should not fund purely intrastate projects]
-
A.
constitutionalDebate
chosen
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, disputing, or interpreting the meaning, scope, or application of a constitution.
-
B.
constitutionalStrategy
Indicates a relationship where an entity adopts or employs a plan or approach specifically aimed at shaping, interpreting, or influencing constitutional rules, structures, or decision-making.
-
C.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
-
D.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
E.
constitutionalEffect
Indicates the impact or consequence that something has on a constitution or constitutional order.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5ae7c88190b0dd41bdafeb5999 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de02ae5e4c8190ad85ad2968bc71b2 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbc86668e08190ba9135d1c3f38d35 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:13 p.m.