Triple

T13839140
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BH90210 E332604 entity
Predicate hasMetaFictionalElement P12417 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [BH90210, hasMetaFictionalElement, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMetaFictionalElement
Context triple: [BH90210, hasMetaFictionalElement, yes]
  • A. hasFictionalContent
    Indicates that something contains or includes material that is imaginary, invented, or not intended to represent real events or facts.
  • B. hasMetafictionalRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity plays a role within a story that self-consciously comments on, references, or breaks the conventions of fiction itself.
  • C. hasFictionalForm
    Indicates that an entity has a counterpart or representation that exists within a fictional or imaginary context.
  • D. hasFictionalUniverseElement
    Indicates that one entity is a component, feature, or constituent part of the fictional universe represented by the other entity.
  • E. hasFictionalProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses a property, attribute, or characteristic that exists only in a fictional or imaginary context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5ae7c88190b0dd41bdafeb5999 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de02ac6b7c81908d44632d6d628339 completed April 14, 2026, 9:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbc86668e08190ba9135d1c3f38d35 completed April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:13 p.m.