Triple

T13825200
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CLIPSAS E332231 entity
Predicate hasAbbreviationOriginLanguage P43870 FINISHED
Object French LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French | Statement: [CLIPSAS, hasAbbreviationOriginLanguage, French]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAbbreviationOriginLanguage
Context triple: [CLIPSAS, hasAbbreviationOriginLanguage, French]
  • A. hasAcronymOrigin
    Indicates that an acronym is derived from or originates from a specific longer expression or name.
  • B. hasAcronymExpansionLanguage chosen
    Indicates that a specified language is the language in which an acronym’s full expansion is expressed.
  • C. hasLanguageOfOrigin
    Indicates that one entity has its origin or source in the language specified by another entity.
  • D. hasAbbreviationStatus
    Indicates that an entity has a particular status or condition regarding its abbreviation (e.g., whether it is abbreviated, how, or to what extent).
  • E. indirectOriginLanguage
    Indicates that something originates from a particular language, not directly but through one or more intermediate languages or sources.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5ae7c88190b0dd41bdafeb5999 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de0285fb7c8190be4b90bdc0d6fa53 completed April 14, 2026, 9:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbc86668e08190ba9135d1c3f38d35 completed April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:13 p.m.