Triple
T13817063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | indium |
E332045
|
entity |
| Predicate | stableIsotope |
P37368
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indium-113 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: indium-113 | Statement: [indium, stableIsotope, indium-113]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stableIsotope Context triple: [indium, stableIsotope, indium-113]
-
A.
commonIsotope
Indicates that two substances share the same most naturally abundant isotope of an element.
-
B.
naturalIsotope
Indicates that one entity is a naturally occurring isotope form of another element or nuclide.
-
C.
isotopes
Indicates that two or more atomic nuclei are variants of the same chemical element that differ in neutron number (and thus mass number) but share the same number of protons.
-
D.
mostStableIsotope
chosen
Indicates that the linked isotope is the most stable (i.e., least likely to undergo radioactive decay) among all isotopes of the referenced element.
-
E.
mostAbundantIsotope
Indicates that one isotope of an element is identified as the most frequently occurring (highest natural abundance) among all its isotopes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c59f8808190a851bc56afdc55e9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0281bb988190803ee195f430b9c8 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbc862e9608190bd8a3d883959b7e4 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:12 p.m.