Triple
T13807843
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Broadcasting Act (Canada) |
E331805
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesPolicyDeclarationFor |
P57657
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canadian broadcasting policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Canadian broadcasting policy | Statement: [Broadcasting Act (Canada), includesPolicyDeclarationFor, Canadian broadcasting policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesPolicyDeclarationFor Context triple: [Broadcasting Act (Canada), includesPolicyDeclarationFor, Canadian broadcasting policy]
-
A.
declaredPolicy
Indicates that an entity has formally stated or announced a specific policy or course of action.
-
B.
containsPolicyOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes, references, or incorporates a specific policy within it.
-
C.
hasPolicySupport
Indicates that one entity provides endorsement, backing, or approval for a specific policy associated with another entity.
-
D.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
E.
issuesPolicyOn
Indicates that an authority or organization formally creates, approves, or enacts a policy concerning a particular subject or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c59f8808190a851bc56afdc55e9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de026eae8481908b8880635e6a9152 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbc862e9608190bd8a3d883959b7e4 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:12 p.m.