Triple
T13792798
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Under tha Influence |
E331439
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tha Divorce Song |
E1061268
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tha Divorce Song | Statement: [Under tha Influence, hasPart, Tha Divorce Song]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tha Divorce Song Context triple: [Under tha Influence, hasPart, Tha Divorce Song]
-
A.
Tha Divorce Song
chosen
"Tha Divorce Song" is a track by rapper and producer DJ Quik, featured on his 2000 studio album "Balance & Options."
-
B.
The Wedding Song
"The Wedding Song" is a track by the band Silhouette, likely featuring their characteristic melodic rock or progressive sound.
-
C.
This Ain’t a Love Song
"This Ain’t a Love Song" is a power ballad by American rock band Bon Jovi, released in 1995 as one of the key singles from their album *These Days*.
-
D.
Divorce Beach
Divorce Beach is a scenic but notoriously rough Pacific-side beach near Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, known for its dramatic rock formations and dangerous swimming conditions.
-
E.
Ain't No Song
"Ain't No Song" is a track from James Taylor's 1974 studio album "Walking Man."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c58feb08190a77bca8bf7d6d20f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0258a1408190a837d17c6d6a2bd4 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:01 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7b8d893448190b37ecbf8d2ded239 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:11 p.m.