Triple

T13786487
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article I court E331270 entity
Predicate hasJudicialPowerScope P111457 FINISHED
Object limited LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited | Statement: [Article I court, hasJudicialPowerScope, limited]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasJudicialPowerScope
Context triple: [Article I court, hasJudicialPowerScope, limited]
  • A. hasJudicialPowerSource
    Indicates the source or origin from which an entity derives its judicial authority or power.
  • B. hasJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
  • C. hasJudiciary
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
  • D. hasSupervisoryJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or body has the legal power to review, oversee, and, if necessary, correct or direct the actions or decisions of another authority or body.
  • E. hasCanonicalJurisdiction
    Indicates that one entity holds official, recognized authority or governing power over another entity or domain within a defined legal or organizational framework.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c58feb08190a77bca8bf7d6d20f completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de0249e4f88190a80316394940627d completed April 14, 2026, 9 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbc85fb600819098a2aab48169be96 completed April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dcad0eea9881908f71e1eed9a2446b completed April 13, 2026, 8:45 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:11 p.m.