Triple
T13785950
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Analog Act |
E331256
|
entity |
| Predicate | penaltyFramework |
P1841
|
FINISHED |
| Object | penalties comparable to those for Schedule I controlled substances |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: penalties comparable to those for Schedule I controlled substances | Statement: [Federal Analog Act, penaltyFramework, penalties comparable to those for Schedule I controlled substances]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: penaltyFramework Context triple: [Federal Analog Act, penaltyFramework, penalties comparable to those for Schedule I controlled substances]
-
A.
penaltyProvision
chosen
Indicates that a rule, contract, or law includes a clause specifying a punishment or sanction for non-compliance or violation.
-
B.
supportsPenalty
Indicates that one entity endorses, approves of, or is in favor of a particular penalty being applied to another entity or situation.
-
C.
defaultPenalty
Indicates that a standard or automatically applied penalty is imposed in the absence of a specific or overridden penalty.
-
D.
penaltySaveBy
Indicates that a penalty kick was successfully saved by a particular goalkeeper.
-
E.
penaltyOrder
Indicates that an authority has issued a formal decision imposing a penalty or sanction on a party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c58feb08190a77bca8bf7d6d20f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0248db988190aa43c3723af25f90 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbc85fb600819098a2aab48169be96 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:11 p.m.