Triple
T13777651
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RIAA Multi-Platinum |
E331049
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresCertificationRequestBy |
P110913
|
FINISHED |
| Object | record label |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: record label | Statement: [RIAA Multi-Platinum, requiresCertificationRequestBy, record label]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresCertificationRequestBy Context triple: [RIAA Multi-Platinum, requiresCertificationRequestBy, record label]
-
A.
requiresCertification
Indicates that one entity can only be performed, accessed, or considered valid if another entity has an appropriate certification.
-
B.
hasRecertificationRequirement
Indicates that an entity is subject to a requirement to periodically renew or update its certification to maintain its valid status.
-
C.
requiresCertificationForNameUse
Indicates that the use of a particular name is conditional upon obtaining a specified certification.
-
D.
requiresProofOf
Indicates that one entity must provide formal evidence or documentation to validate or authorize another entity.
-
E.
canCertify
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to officially certify another entity or its attributes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c583b0081909e408a17db517a21 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0239cbfc81909064ac2457fdfff5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe97846c819093b00ea117b64e0d |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dbc59db0148190bcaf9646403ca64f |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m.