Triple
T13776683
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Territory of Orleans |
E331024
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalPrecedentFor |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil law tradition in Louisiana |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil law tradition in Louisiana | Statement: [Territory of Orleans, hasLegalPrecedentFor, civil law tradition in Louisiana]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalPrecedentFor Context triple: [Territory of Orleans, hasLegalPrecedentFor, civil law tradition in Louisiana]
-
A.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
B.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
C.
hasPrecedentialStatus
Indicates that one legal decision or authority possesses a recognized level of precedential force or binding effect relative to others.
-
D.
createdInstitutionalPrecedentFor
Indicates that one action, decision, or event established a formal example or standard that later guided or constrained institutional behavior, rules, or practices for another.
-
E.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c583b0081909e408a17db517a21 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0238bdbc8190a946e6e5431632a5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe97846c819093b00ea117b64e0d |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m.