Triple

T13759227
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minor v. Happersett E330554 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett E330554 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett | Statement: [Minor v. Happersett, fullCaseName, Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett
Context triple: [Minor v. Happersett, fullCaseName, Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett]
  • A. Minor v. Happersett chosen
    Minor v. Happersett was an 1875 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote, rejecting the argument that suffrage was a privilege of national citizenship.
  • B. Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case
    The Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case was an 1870s U.S. Supreme Court legal challenge in which suffragist Virginia Minor argued that the 14th Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, a claim the Court ultimately rejected.
  • C. United States v. Susan B. Anthony
    United States v. Susan B. Anthony was the landmark 1873 federal criminal case in which suffragist Susan B. Anthony was prosecuted and convicted for illegally voting, spotlighting the legal barriers to women's suffrage in the United States.
  • D. Bradlaugh v. Gossett
    Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
  • E. Prigg v. Pennsylvania
    Prigg v. Pennsylvania was an 1842 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal supremacy over state laws in enforcing the return of escaped enslaved people, significantly strengthening the legal force of the Fugitive Slave Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c573f288190aa2403d484fa3d49 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de0223ab9081909db05334860405e0 completed April 14, 2026, 9 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f7a85dfa6881908da90886db4aa1bb completed May 3, 2026, 7:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:09 p.m.