Triple
T13759227
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minor v. Happersett |
E330554
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett |
E330554
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett | Statement: [Minor v. Happersett, fullCaseName, Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett Context triple: [Minor v. Happersett, fullCaseName, Virginia Minor v. Reese Happersett]
-
A.
Minor v. Happersett
chosen
Minor v. Happersett was an 1875 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote, rejecting the argument that suffrage was a privilege of national citizenship.
-
B.
Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case
The Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case was an 1870s U.S. Supreme Court legal challenge in which suffragist Virginia Minor argued that the 14th Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, a claim the Court ultimately rejected.
-
C.
United States v. Susan B. Anthony
United States v. Susan B. Anthony was the landmark 1873 federal criminal case in which suffragist Susan B. Anthony was prosecuted and convicted for illegally voting, spotlighting the legal barriers to women's suffrage in the United States.
-
D.
Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
-
E.
Prigg v. Pennsylvania
Prigg v. Pennsylvania was an 1842 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal supremacy over state laws in enforcing the return of escaped enslaved people, significantly strengthening the legal force of the Fugitive Slave Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c573f288190aa2403d484fa3d49 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0223ab9081909db05334860405e0 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7a85dfa6881908da90886db4aa1bb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:09 p.m.