Triple
T13759162
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hall v. DeCuir |
E330553
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDecisionDirection |
P50766
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limited state authority over interstate transportation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited state authority over interstate transportation | Statement: [Hall v. DeCuir, hasDecisionDirection, limited state authority over interstate transportation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDecisionDirection Context triple: [Hall v. DeCuir, hasDecisionDirection, limited state authority over interstate transportation]
-
A.
decisionDirection
chosen
Indicates the orientation or course (e.g., choice, stance, or path) that a decision takes relative to available options or influencing factors.
-
B.
hasDecisionPoint
Indicates that there is a specific moment or juncture at which a choice between alternative options or paths must be made.
-
C.
hasFinalDecisionOn
Indicates that one entity holds the ultimate authority or responsibility to make and enforce a conclusive decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
D.
decidedWith
Indicates that an entity made a decision jointly or in agreement with another entity.
-
E.
decidedIn
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c573f288190aa2403d484fa3d49 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0223ab9081909db05334860405e0 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe97846c819093b00ea117b64e0d |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:09 p.m.