Triple

T13750134
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cousins E330325 entity
Predicate usesDialogueDrivenStorytelling P95630 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Cousins, usesDialogueDrivenStorytelling, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesDialogueDrivenStorytelling
Context triple: [Cousins, usesDialogueDrivenStorytelling, true]
  • A. hasDialogueSystem
    Indicates that an entity includes or is equipped with a system for managing dialogue or conversational interactions.
  • B. isNarrativeDriven
    Indicates that an entity’s primary structure or progression is guided by a storyline or plot rather than by mechanics, data, or other non-story elements.
  • C. hasDialogueTrait
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic or quality related to dialogue or conversational behavior.
  • D. hasDialogueIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity participates in or contains spoken or written dialogue within a specified context, such as a scene, work, or medium.
  • E. dialogueDynamic
    Indicates a relationship where entities are engaged in or contributing to an evolving, back-and-forth dialogue or conversational exchange.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c573f288190aa2403d484fa3d49 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de02148c208190a882927905a861a6 completed April 14, 2026, 9 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbbe950b148190ba0df8a749269ec6 completed April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:08 p.m.