Triple

T13729231
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject vaquita marina E329747 entity
Predicate principalAmenaza P23662 FINISHED
Object captura incidental en redes de enmalle LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: captura incidental en redes de enmalle | Statement: [vaquita marina, principalAmenaza, captura incidental en redes de enmalle]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: principalAmenaza
Context triple: [vaquita marina, principalAmenaza, captura incidental en redes de enmalle]
  • A. primaryThreat chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the main or most significant source of danger, harm, or risk to another entity.
  • B. threatenedBy
    Indicates that one entity poses a danger or potential harm to another entity.
  • C. primaryEnemy
    Indicates that one entity is the main or most significant adversary or opponent of another entity.
  • D. primaryAdversaryImplied
    Indicates that an entity is understood or suggested, rather than explicitly stated, to be the main opponent or chief adversary of another entity.
  • E. primaryAdversaryContext
    Indicates the main opposing force or conflict-driving element that defines the central adversarial situation within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d80772315881908f980cae40d91664 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de01f746cc8190abde237bbb7e6c78 completed April 14, 2026, 8:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbbe950b148190ba0df8a749269ec6 completed April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:55 p.m.