Triple
T1371290
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State Library Victoria |
E30116
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDepositFor |
P14394
|
FINISHED |
| Object | publications produced in Victoria |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: publications produced in Victoria | Statement: [State Library Victoria, legalDepositFor, publications produced in Victoria]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDepositFor Context triple: [State Library Victoria, legalDepositFor, publications produced in Victoria]
-
A.
legalDepositSince
Indicates that a legal deposit obligation or status has been in effect for the subject entity continuously since the specified date.
-
B.
hasLegalDeposit
chosen
Indicates that an entity is required to deposit copies of its published material with a designated legal deposit institution or repository.
-
C.
legalHolding
Indicates that an entity possesses or controls something (such as property, assets, or rights) in a manner recognized and defined by law.
-
D.
depositary
Indicates that one entity holds or safeguards something (such as assets, documents, or funds) on behalf of another entity.
-
E.
legalCharge
Indicates that an authority has formally accused an entity of committing a specific legal offense or violation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498f912008190a376a98b207b2071 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c2f314c081909c0ab80397d96abb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4befb08b88190be966fa1aadd4bcd |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:57 p.m.