Triple
T13711211
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Florida Territory |
E328774
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorStateAdmittedToUnionOn |
P111281
|
FINISHED |
| Object | March 3, 1845 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: March 3, 1845 | Statement: [Florida Territory, successorStateAdmittedToUnionOn, March 3, 1845]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorStateAdmittedToUnionOn Context triple: [Florida Territory, successorStateAdmittedToUnionOn, March 3, 1845]
-
A.
admittedSuccessorEntity
Indicates that one entity has been formally accepted or recognized as the successor or replacement of another entity.
-
B.
successorStateClaimedBy
Indicates that a particular state asserts itself as the legal or political successor to another state.
-
C.
successorState
Indicates that one state directly follows another as the immediate next state in a sequence or process.
-
D.
successorStateRepresentedLater
Indicates that one state is a later representation or subsequent version of another state in a temporal or sequential progression.
-
E.
inUniverseSuccessor
Indicates that one entity is the next or following entity in sequence within a particular fictional or defined universe or continuity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80770b9bc81909f70c8c317d53cff |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dd43949e6c8190ae5e4fa119cde33a |
completed | April 13, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe92d77c81908e0244cffb7f78c5 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dbc59ca1a88190a6abd3bd00554c93 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:54 p.m.