Triple

T13699601
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The High Table E328481 entity
Predicate hasMottoLikePrinciple P33142 FINISHED
Object rules and consequences LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rules and consequences | Statement: [The High Table, hasMottoLikePrinciple, rules and consequences]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMottoLikePrinciple
Context triple: [The High Table, hasMottoLikePrinciple, rules and consequences]
  • A. usesMotto
    Indicates that one entity adopts or employs a particular motto as its guiding phrase or slogan.
  • B. hasMottoLikeFunction chosen
    Indicates that something serves a role or function similar to a motto, typically expressing a guiding principle, slogan, or core message.
  • C. hasMottoAuthority
    Indicates that an entity has the official power or right to establish, approve, or oversee the use of a motto for another entity.
  • D. hasMottoTradition
    Indicates that an entity possesses a traditional motto associated with its identity or heritage.
  • E. mottoEmphasizes
    Indicates that a motto highlights, stresses, or gives special importance to a particular idea, value, or theme.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8076ff62081908a7bd79889edd7a0 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbc878b57c819094e7ea6d1a64211f completed April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbbe9059488190a8113177c83e1481 completed April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:54 p.m.