Triple
T1368637
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ingrian Finns |
E30058
|
entity |
| Predicate | culturalRelation |
P22474
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Finnish culture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Finnish culture | Statement: [Ingrian Finns, culturalRelation, Finnish culture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: culturalRelation Context triple: [Ingrian Finns, culturalRelation, Finnish culture]
-
A.
culturalInteraction
Indicates interactions or exchanges between entities that involve cultural practices, values, expressions, or influences.
-
B.
culturallySimilarTo
chosen
Indicates that two entities share comparable cultural characteristics, practices, or values.
-
C.
associatedCult
Indicates that an entity is connected or linked to a particular cult, typically through membership, affiliation, or influence.
-
D.
hasCulturalSignificanceFor
Indicates that something holds particular cultural meaning, value, or importance for a specified group or community.
-
E.
hasCulturalConcept
Indicates that an entity embodies, includes, or is associated with a particular cultural idea, value, practice, or construct.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498f912008190a376a98b207b2071 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c2d497f88190993d16a208ced43d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4befb08b88190be966fa1aadd4bcd |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:57 p.m.