Triple
T13676829
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Faith |
E327898
|
entity |
| Predicate | mainSongwriterContribution |
P111118
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Features songs written by outside songwriters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Features songs written by outside songwriters | Statement: [Faith, mainSongwriterContribution, Features songs written by outside songwriters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainSongwriterContribution Context triple: [Faith, mainSongwriterContribution, Features songs written by outside songwriters]
-
A.
coSongwriter
Indicates that two or more entities collaborated in writing the same song.
-
B.
mainSongwriterInBand
Indicates that the subject is the primary or lead songwriter responsible for most of the music or lyrics in the band.
-
C.
songwriterCollective
Indicates a relationship where a songwriter is a member of, or affiliated with, a collective group of songwriters.
-
D.
musicContribution
Indicates that an entity has contributed in some way to the creation, performance, or production of a musical work.
-
E.
sampledSongwriter
Indicates that one entity has used or incorporated a portion of another entity’s songwriting or composition as a sample in a new work.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076f1fa8819094664a59b55010df |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbc65d8dc081909664e69bb38610ba |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe8d8d0881908d6e89954f44eed4 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dbc59ca1a88190a6abd3bd00554c93 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:53 p.m.