Triple
T13664918
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rutland (Amtrak station) |
E327091
|
entity |
| Predicate | owner |
P347
|
FINISHED |
| Object | City of Rutland |
E331696
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Rutland | Statement: [Rutland (Amtrak station), owner, City of Rutland]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Rutland Context triple: [Rutland (Amtrak station), owner, City of Rutland]
-
A.
Rutland City
chosen
Rutland City is a small city in central Vermont known historically as a regional center for marble quarrying and rail transport.
-
B.
West Rutland
West Rutland is a small town in western Vermont known historically for its marble quarries and rural New England character.
-
C.
Bradentown
Bradentown was the original name of the city now known as Bradenton, Florida, a Gulf Coast community in Manatee County.
-
D.
City of Burlington
The City of Burlington is the municipal government responsible for providing local services, administration, and public amenities to residents of Burlington, North Carolina.
-
E.
Richville
Richville is a small unincorporated community located in Morgan County in the U.S. state of Missouri.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076d8270819092afc2f0e9c359a8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbc622a07c81909ef7fb55e719dd9a |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:19 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f78b0ac4c88190ab6f753c6847eb6e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:52 p.m.