Triple

T13639185
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sikma move E325929 entity
Predicate counterTo P109536 FINISHED
Object traditional back-to-the-basket post defense LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional back-to-the-basket post defense | Statement: [Sikma move, counterTo, traditional back-to-the-basket post defense]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: counterTo
Context triple: [Sikma move, counterTo, traditional back-to-the-basket post defense]
  • A. counterplay
    Indicates a responsive action or strategy taken to oppose, mitigate, or neutralize another party’s move or advantage.
  • B. counterMeasureAgainst chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a response or defensive action intended to prevent, mitigate, or neutralize the effects of another entity.
  • C. count
    Indicates the numerical quantity or total number of instances of a specified entity or event.
  • D. counterSlogan
    Indicates that one slogan is created or used specifically to oppose, refute, or undermine another slogan.
  • E. usesCounterpoint
    Indicates that one entity employs counterpoint, combining independent melodic lines in a structured, interdependent musical relationship with another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8076beddc8190a53156f5bea77f5e completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbc60635d08190899806fe8936f02a completed April 12, 2026, 4:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbbe85e1c4819095194f4b7f9f6118 completed April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:51 p.m.