Triple

T13636481
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 1071 E325860 entity
Predicate definesPropertyOf P5685 FINISHED
Object IP checksum field LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IP checksum field | Statement: [RFC 1071, definesPropertyOf, IP checksum field]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesPropertyOf
Context triple: [RFC 1071, definesPropertyOf, IP checksum field]
  • A. identifiesPropertyOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity specifies or denotes a particular property or attribute belonging to another entity.
  • B. operatesOnPropertyOf
    Indicates that an action or process is applied specifically to a property or attribute of an entity, rather than to the entity itself.
  • C. modularProperty
    Indicates that one entity possesses a characteristic, behavior, or component that is designed to be separable, interchangeable, or recombinable with others in a modular fashion.
  • D. haveProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular property or attribute.
  • E. foundOnPropertyOf
    Indicates that something is located on, discovered on, or otherwise present within the property owned or controlled by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8076beddc8190a53156f5bea77f5e completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbc60635d08190899806fe8936f02a completed April 12, 2026, 4:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbbe85e1c4819095194f4b7f9f6118 completed April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:51 p.m.