Triple
T1363404
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 13B Cannon Crewmember |
E29146
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedMOS |
P6979
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 13F Fire Support Specialist |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 13F Fire Support Specialist | Statement: [13B Cannon Crewmember, relatedMOS, 13F Fire Support Specialist]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedMOS Context triple: [13B Cannon Crewmember, relatedMOS, 13F Fire Support Specialist]
-
A.
relatedMIC
Indicates that there exists a relationship or connection between entities involving a MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) context, such as shared, comparable, or associated MIC values or measurements.
-
B.
relatedTo
Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
-
C.
relatedRFC
Indicates that one resource or specification is connected or associated with another through a shared or relevant RFC (Request for Comments) document.
-
D.
relatedTest
Indicates that there exists some form of connection or association between one test and another.
-
E.
relatedField
chosen
Indicates that one field, topic, or area of study is connected or relevant to another in subject matter or application.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498d77abc8190913bf57e5f51d2c4 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c2b5d05c81908b49e282648e073a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bef945c08190a027472fdd695ea5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:57 p.m.