Triple
T13630730
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barbary Shore |
E325709
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticalReceptionAtRelease |
P2378
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mixed reviews |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mixed reviews | Statement: [Barbary Shore, criticalReceptionAtRelease, mixed reviews]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticalReceptionAtRelease Context triple: [Barbary Shore, criticalReceptionAtRelease, mixed reviews]
-
A.
criticalReception
chosen
Indicates how a work, performance, or product is evaluated and responded to by critics or professional reviewers.
-
B.
metacriticReception
Indicates the critical reception or review score an entity received on Metacritic.
-
C.
hasReceivedCriticalAcclaim
Indicates that the subject has been widely praised or positively recognized by critics or expert reviewers.
-
D.
isNotedByCriticsFor
Indicates that something has been recognized and highlighted by critics specifically for a particular quality, feature, or aspect.
-
E.
hasNotableCritic
Indicates that one entity serves as a significant or widely recognized critic of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076beddc8190a53156f5bea77f5e |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbc60635d08190899806fe8936f02a |
completed | April 12, 2026, 4:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe85e1c4819095194f4b7f9f6118 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:51 p.m.