Triple

T13616329
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bixley E325319 entity
Predicate hasCivilParishFunction P17162 FINISHED
Object local administration LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local administration | Statement: [Bixley, hasCivilParishFunction, local administration]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCivilParishFunction
Context triple: [Bixley, hasCivilParishFunction, local administration]
  • A. hasCivilParishStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds the official administrative status or designation of a civil parish.
  • B. hasParishCouncils
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is administratively associated with one or more parish councils.
  • C. hasCivilParishName
    Indicates that an entity has a specific civil parish name as its designated official name at the civil parish level.
  • D. hasCivicFunction chosen
    Indicates that an entity performs, is responsible for, or is associated with an official public or civic role, duty, or service.
  • E. hasRuralParish
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a rural parish as an administrative or ecclesiastical subdivision.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8076aae28819092cf636190ee5529 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbbb9ee3f081909056dc1a92c40b7a completed April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbae1b3ee481909bd43ded6227a3e5 completed April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:50 p.m.