Triple
T13609924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chandler Bing |
E325160
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesHumorAsDefense |
P110407
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Chandler Bing, usesHumorAsDefense, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesHumorAsDefense Context triple: [Chandler Bing, usesHumorAsDefense, true]
-
A.
humorSetting
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies or controls the level, style, or presence of humor applied to another entity or context.
-
B.
defendsHerselfBy
Indicates that a female entity protects or justifies herself using a specified method, action, or means.
-
C.
hasHumorousTreatmentOf
Indicates that one entity presents or portrays another entity in a humorous, comedic, or joking manner.
-
D.
hasHumorType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular style, category, or type of humor.
-
E.
isHumorousCharacter
Indicates that the character is portrayed in a humorous way or primarily serves a comedic role in the context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076aae28819092cf636190ee5529 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbbb9ee3f081909056dc1a92c40b7a |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbae1b3ee481909bd43ded6227a3e5 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dbbb8c77dc8190b7bd803b5e168d23 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:50 p.m.