Triple
T13597544
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections |
E324859
|
entity |
| Predicate | convictionCount |
P5675
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 5 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 5 | Statement: [Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, convictionCount, 5]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: convictionCount Context triple: [Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, convictionCount, 5]
-
A.
numberOfConvictions
chosen
Indicates the count of times an entity has been formally found guilty of an offense.
-
B.
convictedOf
Indicates that a person or entity has been found guilty of committing a specified offense or crime through a formal legal process.
-
C.
convictedBy
Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
-
D.
convictionYear
Indicates the calendar year in which an entity was formally convicted of an offense.
-
E.
requiredConvictionThreshold
Indicates the minimum level of certainty or confidence that must be reached before a particular decision, judgment, or action is considered justified or allowed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80769eaf081909d82f44e484d6113 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbb0590558819080ccc5874a650b1e |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbae18eaf48190809e8b365856cde9 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:49 p.m.