Triple
T13597540
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections |
E324859
|
entity |
| Predicate | conclusionOnConspiracy |
P16516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government | Statement: [Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, conclusionOnConspiracy, did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionOnConspiracy Context triple: [Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, conclusionOnConspiracy, did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government]
-
A.
concludesAbout
Indicates that one entity forms or states a conclusion regarding another entity or its properties.
-
B.
concludedThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
C.
conspirator
Indicates that an entity participates with others in planning or carrying out a secret or illicit scheme or action.
-
D.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
-
E.
conclusionType
Indicates the specific kind or category of conclusion associated with an argument, inference, or reasoning process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80769eaf081909d82f44e484d6113 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbb0590558819080ccc5874a650b1e |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbae18eaf48190809e8b365856cde9 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:49 p.m.