Triple

T13594293
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Adrian Lyne E324773 entity
Predicate directorialStyle P110214 FINISHED
Object stylish visual aesthetics LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stylish visual aesthetics | Statement: [Adrian Lyne, directorialStyle, stylish visual aesthetics]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: directorialStyle
Context triple: [Adrian Lyne, directorialStyle, stylish visual aesthetics]
  • A. directedInStyle
    Indicates that a work was directed in a particular stylistic manner or according to a specific directing style.
  • B. filmDirection
    Indicates that one entity is the director responsible for overseeing the creative and practical aspects of producing the film represented by the other entity.
  • C. strategyDirectedBy
    Indicates that the development, implementation, or oversight of a strategy is guided or controlled by a specified directing entity.
  • D. hasFilmStyle
    Indicates that a film exhibits or is characterized by a particular cinematic style or aesthetic approach.
  • E. filmDirectorInterpretationBy
    Indicates that a particular interpretation or vision of a film is attributed to a specific director.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d80769eaf081909d82f44e484d6113 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbb057f1c881909a3bb77c659a724a completed April 12, 2026, 2:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbae18eaf48190809e8b365856cde9 completed April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dbaf9f3bdc8190838539aaef1f422b completed April 12, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:49 p.m.