Triple
T13592836
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quil |
E324734
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipInLegend |
P38921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | companion of Guayas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: companion of Guayas | Statement: [Quil, relationshipInLegend, companion of Guayas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipInLegend Context triple: [Quil, relationshipInLegend, companion of Guayas]
-
A.
relationshipToCharacter
chosen
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or narrative connection that one entity has to a given character.
-
B.
characterActorRelationship
Indicates a relationship where an actor portrays or is associated with a specific character in a work.
-
C.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
D.
showsRelationshipWith
Indicates that one entity visually or explicitly presents or demonstrates its connection or association with another entity.
-
E.
relationshipCharacterizedAs
Indicates that one relationship is described, defined, or typified in terms of another specified characteristic or relational type.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80769eaf081909d82f44e484d6113 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbb056ce088190a6feb4266633d18b |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbae18eaf48190809e8b365856cde9 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:49 p.m.