Triple

T1358364
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Second Dutch Police Action E29040 entity
Predicate usedForceType P1062 FINISHED
Object airborne operations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: airborne operations | Statement: [Second Dutch Police Action, usedForceType, airborne operations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedForceType
Context triple: [Second Dutch Police Action, usedForceType, airborne operations]
  • A. forceType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of force involved in an interaction or event (e.g., physical, legal, military, or other defined force classifications).
  • B. usedAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or deployed in opposition to, or for the purpose of affecting, another entity.
  • C. forcedBy
    Indicates that an entity is compelled or coerced into an action or state by another entity.
  • D. inForceIn
    Indicates that a rule, law, agreement, or condition is currently valid and operative within a specified jurisdiction, context, or time frame.
  • E. usedFor
    Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498d77abc8190913bf57e5f51d2c4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c28f5b988190b0be4504eabb919d completed March 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bef7700c819099b294e8d9320e70 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.