Triple

T1357016
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York Family Court E29011 entity
Predicate cannotGrant P27970 FINISHED
Object divorces LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divorces | Statement: [New York Family Court, cannotGrant, divorces]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cannotGrant
Context triple: [New York Family Court, cannotGrant, divorces]
  • A. cannot
    Indicates that one entity lacks the ability, permission, or possibility to perform an action or participate in a specified relationship with another entity.
  • B. cannotReview
    Indicates that an entity is not permitted or able to perform a review of another entity or item.
  • C. cannotVeto
    Indicates that an entity lacks the authority or ability to reject, block, or override a decision, proposal, or action made by another entity.
  • D. authorityGranted
    Indicates that one entity has formally given another entity the power, rights, or permission to act or make decisions, typically within a defined scope or context.
  • E. cannotIntroduce
    Indicates that one entity is not permitted or able to introduce another entity (such as a person, concept, or item) into a given context or to a third party.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498d77abc8190913bf57e5f51d2c4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c28db5048190a279ee9882caaeaf completed March 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bef7700c819099b294e8d9320e70 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c20fd1fc8190977a768b1ed2d23b completed March 1, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.