Triple
T13563221
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eder River |
E323962
|
entity |
| Predicate | tributaryOf |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fulda River |
E662129
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fulda River | Statement: [Eder River, tributaryOf, Fulda River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fulda River Context triple: [Eder River, tributaryOf, Fulda River]
-
A.
Fulda River
chosen
The Fulda River is a major river in central Germany that flows through the state of Hesse and joins the Werra River at Hann. Münden to form the Weser.
-
B.
Schwalm River
The Schwalm River is a waterway in the German state of Hesse that lends its name to the surrounding Schwalm-Eder region.
-
C.
Wiese River
The Wiese River is a tributary of the Rhine flowing through parts of Germany and Switzerland, including the municipality of Riehen near Basel.
-
D.
Schwabach River
The Schwabach River is a small river in Bavaria, Germany, that flows through the town of Schwabach before joining the Rednitz River.
-
E.
Würm River
The Würm River is a small river in Bavaria, Germany, known for flowing north from Lake Starnberg through towns such as Gauting and Starnberg before joining the Amper River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076830b48190910a902bae5888e2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbb00bbe848190bb33efe2af528295 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fed314bb9481908144c5399aa62ffa |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:47 p.m.