Triple

T135581
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Swahili language E2738 entity
Predicate historicallyWrittenIn P4037 FINISHED
Object Arabic script LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arabic script | Statement: [Swahili language, historicallyWrittenIn, Arabic script]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyWrittenIn
Context triple: [Swahili language, historicallyWrittenIn, Arabic script]
  • A. hasWritingTraditionSince
    Indicates that a writing tradition has been present or established for an entity starting from a specified point in time.
  • B. historicallySpokenIn
    Indicates that a language was used for spoken communication in a particular place or region during a past historical period.
  • C. historicalScript chosen
    Indicates that an entity is or was written in, or otherwise associated with, a particular historical writing system or script.
  • D. languageOfEarliestForm
    Indicates the language in which the earliest known form or attested version of something (e.g., a text, name, or expression) is recorded.
  • E. historicallyBorneBy
    Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2520c0f3481908b0ed054a2fca8d0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a257a3ad908190b6a8652f09ae0cbb completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25651b9048190a6277b7fec98c1ea completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:30 a.m.