Triple

T13547974
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mona E323562 entity
Predicate hasLinguisticRole P7162 FINISHED
Object diminutive form LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: diminutive form | Statement: [Mona, hasLinguisticRole, diminutive form]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLinguisticRole
Context triple: [Mona, hasLinguisticRole, diminutive form]
  • A. hasLinguisticFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular linguistic property, trait, or characteristic.
  • B. hasLinguisticElement
    Indicates that one entity includes, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular linguistic component such as a word, phrase, symbol, or other language element.
  • C. hasLinguisticDomain
    Indicates that something (such as a term, expression, or resource) is associated with or applies within a particular linguistic domain or language context.
  • D. hasLinguist
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or possesses a linguist, typically as a member, employee, collaborator, or resource.
  • E. hasLinguisticDescriptionBy
    Indicates that something is described or characterized using language by a particular source, agent, or medium.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8076776248190bdf0d4fa1f85a5fc completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbbb9ee3f081909056dc1a92c40b7a completed April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbae13bec4819084c1770638c00ed9 completed April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:45 p.m.