Triple
T13537244
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Advocate General |
E323291
|
entity |
| Predicate | opinionPurpose |
P79
|
FINISHED |
| Object | assist the Court in reaching its decision |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: assist the Court in reaching its decision | Statement: [Advocate General, opinionPurpose, assist the Court in reaching its decision]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opinionPurpose Context triple: [Advocate General, opinionPurpose, assist the Court in reaching its decision]
-
A.
opinionBy
Indicates that a particular opinion, viewpoint, or judgment is expressed or held by a specific entity.
-
B.
givesOpinionOn
Indicates that one entity expresses a view, judgment, or evaluation about another entity or subject.
-
C.
purpose
chosen
Indicates that one entity exists, is done, or is used in order to achieve, support, or serve the goal, function, or intended outcome of another entity.
-
D.
notableOpinion
Indicates that one entity holds a significant or widely recognized opinion or viewpoint about another entity.
-
E.
languageOfOpinion
Indicates that a particular opinion is expressed or communicated in a specified language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076776248190bdf0d4fa1f85a5fc |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbafbe39948190808062d4eff91841 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbae1046c48190b4ee98c6c9cb9d85 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:45 p.m.