Triple
T13521815
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oleśnica Piasts |
E322915
|
entity |
| Predicate | titleHolderClass |
P27996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Piast dukes |
E62413
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Piast dukes | Statement: [Oleśnica Piasts, titleHolderClass, Piast dukes]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Piast dukes Context triple: [Oleśnica Piasts, titleHolderClass, Piast dukes]
-
A.
Piast dynasty
chosen
The Piast dynasty was the first ruling royal house of Poland, which established and consolidated the early Polish state from the 10th to the 14th century.
-
B.
Racibórz Piasts
The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
-
C.
Pomeranian Piasts
The Pomeranian Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s first ruling Piast dynasty that governed parts of Pomerania during the Middle Ages.
-
D.
Czersk Piasts
The Czersk Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s early medieval Piast royal family, associated with the duchy centered around Czersk in Mazovia.
-
E.
Opole Piasts
The Opole Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Opole and surrounding Silesian territories during the Middle Ages.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80766a21881909f21a1b7421d3b8a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbafa3df0c8190804174695587f0ea |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7549a215c8190a0b18c505d8ca504 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:44 p.m.