Triple
T1349241
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tanco v. Haslam |
E28842
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultAtSupremeCourt |
P12285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | claims effectively resolved when Supreme Court held same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: claims effectively resolved when Supreme Court held same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges | Statement: [Tanco v. Haslam, resultAtSupremeCourt, claims effectively resolved when Supreme Court held same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultAtSupremeCourt Context triple: [Tanco v. Haslam, resultAtSupremeCourt, claims effectively resolved when Supreme Court held same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges]
-
A.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
B.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
C.
majorityJustices
Indicates that the referenced justices constitute more than half of the members of the relevant court or judicial panel in a given decision or context.
-
D.
SupremeCourtEffect
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or condition has an effect that is determined by, derived from, or constrained by the rulings or authority of a supreme court.
-
E.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498571d248190a0ac9eb02d97097f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c268745481908be649526c18e558 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bef5857c81909ae984feb85a26ca |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.