Triple
T1349126
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Baker v. Nelson |
E28840
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | precedent considered in Obergefell v. Hodges |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: precedent considered in Obergefell v. Hodges | Statement: [Baker v. Nelson, relationshipToCase, precedent considered in Obergefell v. Hodges]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToCase Context triple: [Baker v. Nelson, relationshipToCase, precedent considered in Obergefell v. Hodges]
-
A.
relatedCase
chosen
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
B.
associatedWithCourt
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked or connected to a specific court, such as through jurisdiction, affiliation, or involvement in legal proceedings.
-
C.
associatedCourtCase
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
D.
relationshipType
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
E.
relationshipManaged
Indicates that one entity oversees, directs, or maintains responsibility for the ongoing management of a relationship involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498571d248190a0ac9eb02d97097f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c268745481908be649526c18e558 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bef5857c81909ae984feb85a26ca |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.