Triple

T1349124
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baker v. Nelson E28840 entity
Predicate laterTreatment P13185 FINISHED
Object limited and undermined by subsequent Supreme Court decisions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited and undermined by subsequent Supreme Court decisions | Statement: [Baker v. Nelson, laterTreatment, limited and undermined by subsequent Supreme Court decisions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterTreatment
Context triple: [Baker v. Nelson, laterTreatment, limited and undermined by subsequent Supreme Court decisions]
  • A. laterStatus
    Indicates that one entity represents a subsequent or resulting status or condition of another entity in time.
  • B. laterTransmission
    Indicates that one transmission event occurs after another in time.
  • C. laterSought
    Indicates that one entity attempted to obtain, pursue, or request another entity at a subsequent time relative to some prior reference point.
  • D. laterDevelopments chosen
    Indicates that subsequent events, changes, or outcomes occurred following an earlier situation or state.
  • E. treatment
    Indicates that one entity is used as a medical or therapeutic intervention to address, manage, or cure a condition affecting another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498571d248190a0ac9eb02d97097f completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c268745481908be649526c18e558 completed March 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bef5857c81909ae984feb85a26ca completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.