Triple
T134814
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SWIFT |
E2724
|
entity |
| Predicate | notFunction |
P5034
|
FINISHED |
| Object | does not hold customer accounts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: does not hold customer accounts | Statement: [SWIFT, notFunction, does not hold customer accounts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notFunction Context triple: [SWIFT, notFunction, does not hold customer accounts]
-
A.
doesNot
Indicates that a specified entity lacks, refrains from, or fails to perform a particular action or exhibit a particular property in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
doesNotImply
Indicates that the truth of one statement or condition does not guarantee or lead to the truth of another statement or condition.
-
C.
doesNotUse
Indicates that one entity intentionally refrains from employing, utilizing, or relying on another entity, method, or resource.
-
D.
doesNotHave
Indicates that one entity lacks, is missing, or is not in possession of another entity or attribute.
-
E.
hasPrimaryFunction
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or principal function or role of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2520c0f3481908b0ed054a2fca8d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a257a3ad908190b6a8652f09ae0cbb |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25650251c81908a6ea6368cd61198 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a256ea776081908fec36c3fdfb8d84 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:30 a.m.