Triple

T13473880
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mark Binney E318197 entity
Predicate existenceContext P36 FINISHED
Object protagonist’s imagination LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protagonist’s imagination | Statement: [Mark Binney, existenceContext, protagonist’s imagination]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: existenceContext
Context triple: [Mark Binney, existenceContext, protagonist’s imagination]
  • A. contextOf
    Indicates that one entity provides the situational, informational, or environmental background within which another entity exists, occurs, or is interpreted.
  • B. contextType
    Indicates the type or category of contextual information associated with an entity or event.
  • C. context chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides the surrounding circumstances, setting, or background within which another entity, event, or statement occurs or is interpreted.
  • D. acquisitionContext
    Indicates the circumstances, conditions, or setting under which an acquisition or purchase takes place.
  • E. contextHolds
    Indicates that a particular contextual condition or situation is valid and in effect for the related entities or statements.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b6bfec819089222715b2e86c8e completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbaf2447bc81908baf1f4b55095144 completed April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbadfddefc81909ef7fde23b181b5c completed April 12, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:42 p.m.