Triple
T13473584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aberforth Dumbledore |
E318189
|
entity |
| Predicate | animagusStatus |
P62729
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not an Animagus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not an Animagus | Statement: [Aberforth Dumbledore, animagusStatus, not an Animagus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: animagusStatus Context triple: [Aberforth Dumbledore, animagusStatus, not an Animagus]
-
A.
animagus
Indicates a transformative relationship where a wizard or witch can voluntarily change into a specific animal form and back again.
-
B.
animagusForm
Indicates that one entity is the specific animal form into which the other entity can transform as an Animagus.
-
C.
magicalStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, is affected by, or is characterized in terms of a particular magical condition or property.
-
D.
patronusAbility
Indicates the ability of an entity to produce or use a Patronus (a protective magical manifestation) in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
patronus
Indicates that one entity serves as a protective guardian or spiritual defender for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b6bfec819089222715b2e86c8e |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbaf2447bc81908baf1f4b55095144 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbadfddefc81909ef7fde23b181b5c |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:42 p.m.