Triple

T13463807
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dukes of Rutland E311439 entity
Predicate hasHeraldryType P110465 FINISHED
Object coat of arms LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coat of arms | Statement: [Dukes of Rutland, hasHeraldryType, coat of arms]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeraldryType
Context triple: [Dukes of Rutland, hasHeraldryType, coat of arms]
  • A. hasHeraldicRole
    Indicates that an entity holds or is assigned a specific role or function within a heraldic context (such as in coats of arms, armorial bearings, or heraldic ceremonies).
  • B. hasHeraldicFamily
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular heraldic family or lineage, typically sharing the same coat of arms or heraldic identity.
  • C. hasHeraldicSubject
    Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic subject or emblematic figure depicted on another entity, such as on a coat of arms or shield.
  • D. hasHeraldicBasis
    Indicates that something is founded on, derived from, or justified by heraldic principles, symbols, or traditions.
  • E. hasHeraldicUse
    Indicates that something is used as, or incorporated into, a heraldic device, emblem, or coat of arms.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806a938b8819097ec43a2229fc7f9 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbaf0f1830819085700b4521e44678 completed April 12, 2026, 2:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbadfddefc81909ef7fde23b181b5c completed April 12, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dbaecc98cc8190829f5be759c4f1e3 completed April 12, 2026, 2:40 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m.