Triple

T1345635
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Murray Irrigation Area E28563 entity
Predicate hasPolicyContext P11690 FINISHED
Object subject to Murray–Darling Basin Plan LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject to Murray–Darling Basin Plan | Statement: [Murray Irrigation Area, hasPolicyContext, subject to Murray–Darling Basin Plan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPolicyContext
Context triple: [Murray Irrigation Area, hasPolicyContext, subject to Murray–Darling Basin Plan]
  • A. hasPolicyArea
    Indicates that an entity (such as a policy, program, or initiative) is associated with or pertains to a specific policy area or domain.
  • B. hasPolicyBody
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or defined by, a specific policy document or policy text.
  • C. policyContext chosen
    Indicates the situational or regulatory framework within which a policy is defined, interpreted, or applied.
  • D. hasPolicyHistory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a record or sequence of past policies that have applied to it over time.
  • E. hasPolicyGoal
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or aims to achieve, a specific policy objective or target.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49854eb3481908c7d56b2e449a290 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c23e84188190b0395c57dd45b62a completed March 1, 2026, 10:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bef5857c81909ae984feb85a26ca completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.