Triple
T13451760
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tree at the Furthest Limit |
E320622
|
entity |
| Predicate | conceptualType |
P109555
|
FINISHED |
| Object | metaphysical boundary |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: metaphysical boundary | Statement: [Tree at the Furthest Limit, conceptualType, metaphysical boundary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conceptualType Context triple: [Tree at the Furthest Limit, conceptualType, metaphysical boundary]
-
A.
conceptualRole
Indicates the functional or semantic role that one concept plays in relation to another within a conceptual structure or system.
-
B.
isConceptual
Indicates that something exists as an abstract or theoretical idea rather than as a concrete, physical entity.
-
C.
conceptualizedFor
Indicates that one entity has been conceived, designed, or mentally framed specifically for use, application, or relevance to another entity.
-
D.
conceptualScope
Indicates the range or domain of ideas, concepts, or topics that something (such as a work, theory, or term) is intended to cover or address.
-
E.
conceptualizedBy
Indicates that something exists as an idea, model, or concept that was formed or defined by a particular agent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80761e6cc8190a90c844589998ecc |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbaefae85481909e6a59797cbb25e7 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9a03ce03481908c61094f0cc0c158 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dadce235f88190a6433395d2969811 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m.